Legal Opinion
Winchester v. Hertrich
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided February 2, 1995No. Civ. A. 92C-04-104, 92C-04-43PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERLIHY, Judge.
Presently before the Court are two motions relating to the extent to which, if any, expert witnesses originally retained by one party can be utilized by the opposing party. While certain issues are shared by these two motions, there are material procedural and factual differences which need to be mentioned.
FACTS
In Winchester, the instant motion is one to compel an examining physician to attend and answer questions at a deposition. The underlying action is one for personal injuries wherein the plaintiff 1 suffered loss of sight in one eye when hit by a BB shot on January…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Granger v. WisnerArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Ager v. Stormont-Vail HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Fenlon v. ThayerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- Cogdell v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Fitzpatrick v. Holiday Inns, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Green v. Alfred A.I. DuPont Institute of the Nemours FoundationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- DUNNING v. THOMASDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021
- Fardjallah v. Christiana HospitalSuperior Court of Delaware · 2025
- Mazen Shahin and Nina Shahin v. City of Dover and Cheryl A. Bundek, City of Dover Tax AssessorCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2018
- Twitter, Inc. v. Elon R. MuskCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2022