Legal Opinion

Swinehart v. Turner

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1927No. 4710PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

A statement of this case appears in Swinehart v. Turner, 38 Ida. 602, 224 Pac. 74, the present action being based upon the amended complaint filed after this court had decided that the prior complaint stated a cause of action.

There was evidence to support the finding of the lower court that notices were published and posted according to the statute. Raising the question of the failure of the probate court to require an additional bond upon the sale of the property would constitute, so far as this action is concerned, a collateral attack insufficient upon which to predicate a conclusion that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burris v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Ryan v. FergussonWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Granger v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Woodard v. UtterIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
  5. French v. PhelpsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bruun v. HansonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. Fleshman v. FleshmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Harkness v. Utah Power & Light Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1930
  4. In Re Condos's EstateNevada Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Davenport v. SimonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API