Lado v. City of Rome
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint against defendant City of Rome dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of the City of Rome (defendant) to dismiss the complaint against it. Michael Lado (plaintiff) was injured while proceeding across North Street in the City of Rome when he tripped over a water valve vault, the cover of which was missing. It is undisputed that defendant did not have prior written notice of the unsafe, dangerous or defective condition as required by City of Rome Charter Laws, title A, § 176. There are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Amabile v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Poirier v. City of SchenectadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- D'Ambrosio v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Kiernan v. ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- ITT Hartford Insurance v. Village of OssiningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Dubriske v. Village of Port ChesterNew York Supreme Court, Westchester County · 2025