Legal Opinion

Poirier v. City of Schenectady

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1995PublishedCited by 208 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ciparick, J.

The Schenectady City Charter contains a provision that bars civil actions against the City for damages or injuries resulting from defective, dangerous, unsafe, obstructed or out of repair streets, sidewalks, crosswalks or similar public thoroughfares unless the injured party can demonstrate that the Schenectady Commissioner of Public Works had prior written notice of the offending condition and failed or neglected to remedy the condition within a reasonable time after receipt of the notice. We conclude that a protruding traffic sign post anchor is the type of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Alexander v. EldredNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. D'Ambrosio v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Doremus v. Incorporated Village of LynbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Kiernan v. ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Monteleone v. Incorporated Village of Floral ParkNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by208 opinions

  1. Amabile v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Kaufman v. SilverNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Katz v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Wilma Williams v. Kfc National Management CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  5. Gorman v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 2009

203 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API