Legal Opinion

State v. Dickens

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 12, 1971No. 80PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

Defendant assigns as error the action of the trial judge in admitting into evidence, over objection, clothing worn by defendant when he was taken into custody a short time after the alleged crime.

It is well settled in North Carolina that clothing worn- by a person while in custody under a valid arrest may be taken from him for examination, and, when otherwise competent, such clothing may be introduced into evidence at his trial. State v. Rogers, 275 N.C. 411, 168 S.E. 2d 345, State v. Peele, 274 N.C. 106, 161 S.E. 2d 568; State v. Tippett, 270 N.C. 588, 155 S.E. 2d 269.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. NoellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. SteenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API