State v. Dickens
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
Defendant assigns as error the action of the trial judge in admitting into evidence, over objection, clothing worn by defendant when he was taken into custody a short time after the alleged crime.
It is well settled in North Carolina that clothing worn- by a person while in custody under a valid arrest may be taken from him for examination, and, when otherwise competent, such clothing may be introduced into evidence at his trial. State v. Rogers, 275 N.C. 411, 168 S.E. 2d 345, State v. Peele, 274 N.C. 106, 161 S.E. 2d 568; State v. Tippett, 270 N.C. 588, 155 S.E. 2d 269.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. NoellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. SteenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.