Legal Opinion
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Advanced Environmental Recycling Technologies, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 28, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-351-JJFPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARNAN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Presently before the Court are three Motions to Dismiss filed by Counterclaim Defendants, Andrew U. Ferrari (D.I. 87), Arthur C. Ferguson (D.I. 84), and Paul M. Herbst (D.I. 90). The Counterclaim Defendants seek dismissal of Advanced Environmental Recycling Technologies, Inc.’s (“AERT”) counterclaims against them pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the grounds that the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over them. Because the Court finds that it lacks personal jurisdiction over Mr. Ferrari the Court will grant his Motion to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Boone v. Oy Partek AbSuperior Court of Delaware · 1997
- Rusakiewicz v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Resource Ventures, Inc. v. Resources Management International, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Reach & Associates, P.C. v. DencerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- Joint Stock Society "Trade House of Descendants of Peter Smirnoff, Official Purveyor to the Imperial Court" v. Heublein, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.