Legal Opinion
Inman v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 14, 1959No. 36Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
361 U.S. 138 (1959)
INMAN
v.
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO.
No. 36.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 12, 1959.
Decided December 14, 1959.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
Raymond J. McGowan argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
William A. Kelly argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were C. G. Roetzel and John L. Rogers, Jr.
2Opinion of the Court · ClarkJustice Clark
Petitioner brought this action under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 35 Stat. 65, 45 U. S. C. § 51, for personal injuries sustained in the course of his employment. Petitioner for some seven years had been a railroad crossing watchman…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Lillie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Inman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Cahill v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.