Legal Opinion

Inman v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 14, 1959No. 36PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

Petitioner brought this action under the. Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 35 Stat. 65, 45 U. S. C. § 51, for personal injuries sustained in the course of his employment. Petitioner. for some seven years had been a railroad crossing watchman for respondent at “Bettes Corners” in Akron, Ohio. He filed suit claiming damages for an injury he received when an intoxicated automobile driver ran into him one midnight while he was on duty flagging traffic for a passing train. Bettes Corners is a heavily traveled vehicular' intersection where Tallmadge Avenue, running east and west, is intersected by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Inman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Eversole v. ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1958

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Connie Strickland v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Willard Green v. River Terminal Railway Co., Third Party Jerald E. Dawson, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Chester Oglesby v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API