Legal Opinion

Duroff & Duke v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 14, 1921PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the 'Court by

Judge Sampson

— Affirming’.

Mike Duroff and Nick Duke, two sons of Servia who have been in this country only a short time, were indicted in the Floyd circuit court for the crime of grand larceny, and upon trial, convicted and their punishment fixed at one year’s confinement in the state penitentiary. They appeal. In doing so they urge the following grounds for reversal of the judgment against them: (1) The court erred in failing to sustain their motion to quash the indictment because there was no sufficient order showing its return by the grand jury and that it was filed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gordon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Thompson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  3. Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  4. Ankrim v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  5. Nioum v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kinard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Kreiner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  3. United States v. RhodenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. Stassi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  5. Jack Fairbanks v. Henry E. Cowan, Superintendent, Kentucky State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API