Legal Opinion
State v. Crawford
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1920No. Criminal No. 488PublishedCited by 6 opinions
APPEAL from a.judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Pinal. O. J. Baughn, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The charge against respondents was set forth in the information in this language:
“The said Joseph M. Crawford and Prank Nelson, on or about the 30th day of January, 1920, and before the filing of this information, at and in the county of Pinal, state of Arizona, did then and there wilfully and unlawfully attempt to manufacture intoxicating liquor in the aforesaid county of Pinal, state of Arizona, contrary,” etc.
Respondents ’ demurrer to the information was: Insufficient facts; that the acts constituting the offense in ordinary and concise language were not stated; and that the information…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. StearnsNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- People v. PetrosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- People v. SeldnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- People v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- People v. HoytAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MandelArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- United States v. BakerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
- Richardson v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. IhanWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Nolte v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.