Legal Opinion
People v. Murray
California Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1885No. 20079PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the county of San Joaquin sustaining a demurrer to the information. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
The defendants were accused, by information, of the crime of attempt to commit burglary, a felony, committed as follows: —
“The said John Murray and James Cunningham .... did wilfully, unlawfully, and feloniously attempt to wilfully, unlaw*104fully, and feloniously enter that certain room of,” etc., “with the intent then and there, and therein, wilfully, unlawfully, and feloniously to commit larceny.”
The information was demurred to on the ground that it did not comply with sections 950 and 951 of the Penal Code, the first of which sections declares that the information must contain a…
2Cited by8 opinions
- People v. RozelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. MalleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- State v. WilliamsonUtah Supreme Court · 1900
- People v. WeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. SwanUtah Supreme Court · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.