Legal Opinion
Gardner v. United States Bureau of Land Management
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 7, 2011No. 09-35647PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-Appellants Fred Gardner and Concerned Citizens for Little Canyon Mountain (sometimes collectively Gardner) brought suit for declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to the Administrative Pro cedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706, seeking to compel Defendant-Appellee United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to prohibit off-road vehicle use of Oregon’s Little Canyon Mountain area. The district court granted summary judgment to the BLM. On appeal, Gardner asserts that the BLM’s failure to close Little Canyon Mountain to off-road vehicle use…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Arrington v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Western Watersheds Project v. Bob AbbeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Great Old Broads for Wildernes v. Abigail KimbellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Scarborough Citizens Protecting Resources v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Wildlands CPR, Inc. v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2012
- Los Padres Forestwatch v. UsfsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.