Legal Opinion
Horner v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 24, 1987No. Appeals, Nos. 2367 C.D. 1985, 2368 C.D. 1985, 2369 C.D 1985, 2370 C.D. 1985 and 2371 C.D. 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Doyle,
Gary L. Horner, Larry F. Miller, Frank T. Monaco, Patrick J. Smyth and Gregory Sutor (Claimants) were discharged by their employer, the United Parcel Service (Employer), for falsifying their time records and *61taking extended breaks. Claimants separately applied for unemployment compensation benefits, and the Office of Employment Security denied each of them benefits on the ground that their discharges were due to willful misconduct. Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., PL. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 PS.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Reardon v. MeehanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Bessemer Stores, Inc. v. Reed Shaw Stenhouse, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Great Coastal Express, Inc. v. SchrueferCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- People v. DusingNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Kundrat v. Commonwealth, State Dental Council & Examining BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Broadus v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. BinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018