People v. Dusing
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, J.
Defendant’s conviction in City Court of Buffalo on an automobile speeding charge (Buffalo City Ordinances, oh. 60, § 14, subd. 3) was reversed by an order which, since it does not specify “ on the law ” or “on the facts ”, must be considered a reversal on the law alone (Code Crim. Pro., § 543-a, subd. 4). The appellate court in its opinion rejected as insufficient the two types of proof offered to prove speeding. The proof of a radar reading was ruled out because, although there was some showing of a test of the radar equipment, there was no indication that the automobile speedometer against…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. HeyserNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Senecal v. DrolletteNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Salter v. . Utica and Black River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Fisher v. Union Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
3Cited by29 opinions
- Hallmark v. EldridgeNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Commonwealth v. WhynaughtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- People v. AbdallahAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- State v. GerdesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- People v. BarbicAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.