Legal Opinion
Baumgardner v. Smurfit-Stone Container Corp.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 2, 2004No. Civil 04-730-JOPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JONES, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Richard Baumgardner, Chris- . tine Devine, Gary Nathan, and Mike Mitchell bring this action against defendant Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation alleging four claims: 1) breach of collective bargaining agreements in violation' of § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”); 2) breach of common law fiduciary duty; 3) violations of Oregon wage laws, ORS 652.120 et seq; and 4) equitable estoppel under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”).
This court has jurisdiction pursuant' to the judicial review provision of the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rance Preston v. Legacy Health et al.District Court, D. Oregon · 2026