Legal Opinion
Smith v. City of North Charleston
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided November 18, 2005No. 2:04-0172-PMDPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DUFFY, District Judge.
In this action, Plaintiffs Gina Smith, Cathy Poole, and Harvey Poole (“Plaintiffs”) allege violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and a state law cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The record includes a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of a United States Magistrate Judge, which was made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate recommends that Defendants Miller and the City’s motions for summary judgment be granted as to all of Plaintiffs’ claims. A…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stevens v. Del Webb Communities, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
- Cothran v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- Godfrey v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
- Harvey v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- McMahan v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.