Legal Opinion

Beaton v. Fussell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 15, 1914No. 5247PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Kimble County ; Clarence Martin, Judge. Action by J. W. Fussell against G. W. Beaton and another. Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCarl, J.

Appellee, J. W. Fussell, sued G. W. Beaton to enforce specific performance of a contract, whereby it is alleged appellant agreed to convey four lots in the town of London, Kimble county, and all improvements thereon, to appellee, in consideration of $200 cash, and the balance to be represented by two vendor’s lien notes, each for $225, bearing 8 per cent, interest, and due respectively July 7, 1914, and July 7, 1915. The contract describes the property as: “My place in London, Kimble county, Texas, consisting of four lots in the town of London, county of Kimble, state of Texas, with resi…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hermann v. LikensTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Watson v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Pierson v. Sanger Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Taffinder v. MerrellTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Wilson v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1878

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pickett v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Long v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Sorsby v. ThomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Philip A. Ryan Lumber Co. v. BallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Kellner v. RamdohrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API