Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 15, 1976No. [No. 171, September Term, 1975.]PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, C. J.

Eldridge, J., concurs in the result and filed a concurring opinion at page 226 infra.

Appellant Dorsey and Isaiah Wilson were found guilty by a jury of conspiracy to commit murder and murder in the first degree. On appeal to the Court of Special Appeals, they claimed that the jury instructions dealing with the presumption of malice, and which placed upon them the burden of proving such mitigation as would negate malice, was unconstitutional under Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U. S. 684, 95 S. Ct. 1881, 44 L.Ed.2d 508 (1975), and In re Winship, 397 U. S. 358, 90 S. Ct. 1068, 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970).1…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Newton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Curtis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. State v. BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. FryeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Tripp v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API