Vogel v. Wachtel, Admr.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The petition for a rehearing in above cause is hereby granted, and the opinion of May 9, 1933, heretofore rendered, is hereby superseded by the opinion of the court, as follows:
Appellee, Joseph Wachtel, administrator of the estate of Fritz Hess, deceased, brought this action in the probate court of Marion county against the appellant, Pauline Vogel, and the appellee, Railroadmen’s Building and Savings Association, for intermeddling, under §3317, Burns 1926, §6-2201, Burns 1933, §3066, Baldwin’s 1934, upon a complaint in, two paragraphs.
The first paragraph charged that the decedent, Fritz…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re the Estate of HeinzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Dinsmoor v. BresslerIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Gibson v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
- Humbarger v. HumbargerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Barto v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schroeder v. Dickinson Trust Co. of RichmondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942