Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Cook

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 18, 1884PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. This appeal was taken from an order of the Superior Court of Baltimore City, reversing an order of the Orphans’ Court of said city, and remanding the cause with directions to the latter Court to enter an order requiring the appellant to deliver to the appellee as administrator of James Dooner, deceased, the money in question, as part of the personal estate of said Dooner. The case is stated in the opinion of this Court.

1Opinion of the CourtIrving, J.

The appellee, Erederic C. Cook, as administrator of James Dooner, filed his petition in the Orphans’ Court of Baltimore City, alleging that his intestate in his life-time “opened two accounts in Bank in the names of James Dooner and Edward Gibson, and the survivor of them, subject to the order of either — one in the Savings Bank of Baltimore, and one in the Eutaw Savings Bank.” The petition alleges that from time to time he deposited to the credit of the said account in the Savings Bank of Baltimore $4,674.40, and in the Eutaw Savings Bank $1,814.67. The petition alleges that Dooner in his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. BruscupCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1867
  2. Lammott v. MaulsbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dinsmoor v. BresslerIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Linthicum v. PolkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  3. Watkins v. RivesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  4. Estate of Huffman v. HuffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Fowler v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API