Legal Opinion
Adams v. Kraft
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 25, 2011No. 5:10-CV-00602-LHKPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.
Plaintiff Berry Lynn Adams (“Adams”) brings this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 against Defendants Daniel L. Kraft (“Kraft”), Phillip Hauck (“Hauck”), Kirk Lingenfelter (“Lingenfelter”), and K.P. Best (“Best”), (collectively “Defendants”), all of whom are California State Park Rangers (“Park Rangers”), alleging unlawful search and arrest, excessive force, and retaliation, in violation of his rights under the First and Fourth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution and Article I,…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- (PS) Osborne v. Tracy Police DeptDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Ashkaun Rafigh v. City of Paso Robles Police DepartmentDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
- CA Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. AllisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Don Blythe v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026
- Heko Services, Inc. v. ChemTrack Alaska, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.