Legal Opinion

Williams v. Woodard

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1952No. Appeal, 12PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

This assumpsit action arose out of the issuance of a writ of foreign attachment. Appellants, husband and wife, sought to recover of Kersey Woodard and Laura S., his wife, appellees, the sum of $875 representing the purchase price of certain electrical reducing equipment. A jury rendered a verdict for appellees. This appeal is from the dismissal by the court en banc of appellants’ motion for a new trial in which they complained of inadequacy of the trial judge’s charge to the jury.

In view of the disposition we hereinafter make, it becomes unnecessary to recite the facts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. De Reeder v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Kindt v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Patterson v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Randolph v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Se-Ling Hosiery, Inc. v. MarguliesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Takach v. B. M. Root Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. National Products Co. v. Atlas Financial Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Halpern v. Western Pennsylvania Chemical Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Takach v. B. M. Root Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API