Legal Opinion

Johnson v. McLaughlin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the district court of the first judicial district, ■county of Pima. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

By Court,

French, J.:

This action was heard before the district judge, without a jury, and full findings of fact filed.

Ho exceptions were taken, nor any objections made to said findings by either party. The judgment was for the plaintiffs.

A motion for a new trial was made by the defendants, on the grounds of insufficiency of the evidence to justify the decision and judgment, and that the same were against law, which motion was denied, and this appeal is from both the judgment and order denying a new trial. On its first hearing in this court the judgment and order denying a new trial were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. English v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Bell v. Bed Rock Tunnel & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1868
  3. McGarrity v. ByingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Dutch Flat Water Co. v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  5. King v. EdwardsMontana Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Emerson v. McWhirterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Sturtevant v. VogelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
  3. Smart v. StauntonArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Sturtevant v. VogelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API