Legal Opinion
Citizens National Bank v. Ariss
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 1912No. 9913PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered May 10, 1911, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff by direction of the court, in an action upon a draft.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
Action by the plaintiff, Citizens National Bank of Los Angeles, California, upon a negotiable draft cashed by it, reading as follows:
“$1,492.30 Los Angeles, Cal., 7-21, 1910.
“8892.
“Pay to the order of Citizens Nat. Bank Fourteen Hundred and Ninety-two Dollars with exchange value received and charge the same to account of To Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.
No. P. F. E. 3591, Tacoma, Wash.
“C. J. Hicks, Agent.
“Ariss, Campbell & Gault.”
The complaint alleged that the defendants, by their agent, C. J. Hicks, thereunto duly authorized, made and delivered the draft; that the drawee refused payment, of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Long v. ColburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jump v. SparlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Codd v. Westchester Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Blakiston v. Osgood Panel & Veneer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
- Consumers Twine & Machinery Co. v. Mount Pleasant Thermo Tank Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Gutelius v. StanbonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.