Legal Opinion

Leland v. J. T. Baker Chemical Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1980No. 506-507PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., 480 Pa. 547, 391 A.2d 1020 (1978), which barred the use of the words “unreasonably dangerous” in jury instructions in cases involving strict products liability, should not have been applied retroactively. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the order of the lower court granting a new trial.

Appellee Arlene B. Leland was employed as a laboratory technician at a Philadelphia hospital. Her duties included cleaning utensils in reagent grade sulfuric acid manufactured by appellant. On December 11, 1964, appellee obtained two…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
  5. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McCloskey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Walnut Street Associates, Inc. v. Brokerage Concepts, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Baker v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Grim v. BetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API