Legal Opinion

People v. Nanninga

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1921No. Docket No. 116PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Muskegon; Vanderwerp (John), J. William Nanninga was convicted of violating the liquor law.

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Defendant was convicted of a violation of the liquor law, under an information of one count, charging that:

“He did unlawfully manufacture * * * and was then and there engaged in the business of manufacturing whisky, and was then and there in possession of certain still, kettles, pails, coils, rye, sugar and a quantity of sour corn mash, all of the same being implements and ingredients used in the manufacture of whisky.”

There was found upon the premises of defendant a large copper kettle with an iron band around the top firmly fixed with hooks and bolts, designed to hold the cover in place on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State v. RavanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  3. State v. . HornerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Holford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Trent v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  3. State v. DennerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. State v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State v. LehnaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API