Legal Opinion

Keesling v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1958No. 34260PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

The plaintiff is the owner of lots 12 and 7, Forshee’s Sound View Villa, in the city of Seattle, which he acquired by deeds dated January 3, 1951, and February 9, 1951. His residence is located on lot 12, which fronts on 4th avenue northwest. Lot 7 is a vacant lot -back of his residence, across which he has a view of Puget Sound, obstructed by a light pole at the southeast corner of lot 7 and by four electric wires strung from the crossarms of the pole. These wires extend across lot 7 and parallel to the west line of lot 12, connecting to poles in a single line between the two rows of lots.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. International Contract Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Papac v. City of MontesanoWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Kalinowski v. JacobowskiWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Maple Leaf Investors, Inc. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Wernberg v. Matanuska Electric AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Olson v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Rains v. Department of FisheriesWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Kershaw Sunnyside Ranches, Inc. v. Yakima Interurban Lines Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API