Legal Opinion

United States v. Defreitas

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided May 6, 2010No. 1:07-cr-00543PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

DORA L. IRIZARRY, District Judge:

Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Defendant Russell Defreitas moves to suppress evidence seized from an apartment in Brooklyn, New York. Pursuant to the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, all defendants move to suppress certain out-of-court statements, or, in the alternative, to sever the trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 14(a). 1 Defendants Kareem Ibrahim and Abdul Kadir also move for severance on the ground of prejudicial spillover. For the reasons set forth below, Defreitas’…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. AshburnDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  2. United States v. Guillen-RivasDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API