Higginbotham v. Inland Empire Ins.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Judge.
Plaintiff, the father of two minor children injured in an auto-truck collision, sued to recover damages for those injuries and the resulting medical expense individually and on their behalf. The trial court .allowed recovery, and defendants appeal.
Defendants filed an exception of.no right and cause of action in this court, directed at plaintiff’s admitted failure to introduce evidence in support of the allegation in his petition (denied by defendants in answer) that the minor children were born of his presently existing marriage to their alleged mother.
Plaintiff-father has the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wheeler v. RodriguezLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Bell v. HoldcraftLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
- Koepping v. MonteleoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- Union Bank v. DunnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
- McVay v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Higginbotham v. FrazierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Simon v. CalvertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Alexander v. Town of JeaneretteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- Eubanks v. HoffmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Modicut v. RistLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.