Legal Opinion
Bell v. Holdcraft
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 3, 1940No. 6126PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DREW, Judge.
Plaintiff filed this suit on September 4, 1934. He alleged that on September 9, 1931, he sold and delivered to defendant mill work, building materials and builder’s supplies to the amount of $340.61 and that no part of said bill had been paid. An itemized statement was attached to the petition and judgment prayed for accordingly.
On October 13, 1934, defendant, represented by counsel, filed a plea of prescription of three years. The minutes of the court disclose that no further action was taken in the case until October 4, 1938, when the plea of prescription was referred to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Succession of RobinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- City of New Orleans v. Le BourgeoisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
- Burthe v. LeeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Nessans v. ColomesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
3Cited by23 opinions
- St. Mary v. St. MaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- McKinney v. LevyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Young v. WarnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Muller v. Michel Lecler Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- Gumina v. DupasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.