County of Cass v. County of Sarpy

Ames, 0.

This case is before ns on a rehearing granted from a former decision published in 63 Nebr., 813. Counsel for *474both parties have expressed their concurrence in that opinion, and further reference to it would be unnecessary but for the fact that counsel for Kearney county, intervening as amici curia}, still insist that the proviso added to section 88 of the statute* by the amendment of 1899, is applicable to such bridges only as have been built pursuant to a joint contract between the counties interested. As pointed out in a former opinion, and as is contended also by counsel, to adopt…