Legal Opinion

Robert G. Rosser v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 28, 1993No. 92-6926PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

Taxpayer Robert G. Rosser (“Rosser”) brought this action under 26 U.S.C. § 7422(a) for refund of allegedly overpaid federal income taxes. The United States (the “government”) filed a motion for summary judgment, contending that the suit was barred by the applicable two-year statute of limitations laid out in 26 U.S.C. § 6632(a)(1). The district court denied the motion and, pursuant to a stipulation by the parties as to the relevant amount, entered judgment in favor of Rosser. The government now appeals from this judgment. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Ned Miller and Frances Miller v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. Southeast Bank of Orlando v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. First Alabama Bank, N.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Webb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. Brady v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2011
  3. Fremuth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Byrne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Finkelstein v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API