Legal Opinion

Fremuth v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 13, 2016No. 16-143T (Pro Se)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keywords: Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Pro Se Complaint; Tax Refund; Administrative Refund Request; Informal Claim Doctrine; I.R.C. § 6511; I.R.C. § 6532; Statute of Limitations.

OPINION AND ORDER

KAPLAN, Judge.

In this tax refund case, pro se Plaintiff Erica Fremuth, a non-resident alien, claims that she is entitled to a refund of taxes withheld from her monthly Social Security payments for the tax years 2000 to 2007 and 2009 to 2012. The government has moved to dismiss Ms. Fremuth’s complaint under Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (RCFC) 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).

As discussed below, the Court…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bowerman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  2. James v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  3. Meissner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  4. Payne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  5. Peretz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API