Lunday-Thagard Co. v. United States Department of the Interior
Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
METZNER, Judge.
Plaintiff Lunday-Thagard Company (“Lunday-Thagard”) appeals from a judgment of the Western District of Louisiana (Veron, J.) dismissing as time-barred its action for overcharges. Section 210 of the Emergency Stabilization Act (“ESA”), 12 U.S.C. § 1904 Note, as incorporated in § 5(a)(1) of the Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act (“EPAA”), 15 U.S.C. § 754. The claim arises from the sale of crude oil by defendant United States Department of Interior (“DOI”). The action also asserts a claim for breach of contract. DÓI seeks affirmance of the judgment and renews its argument, pressed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tipperary Refining Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. AlaskaTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1991
- TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. United States Dept. of InteriorTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1987
- Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017