Legal Opinion

Jaynes v. Petoskey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1944No. Docket No. 10, Calendar No. 42,593PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShahee, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a decree dismissing his bill of complaint in which he sought to recover a commission upon the sale of a 55-acre tract of land. The material facts are not in dispute. Eudolph and Huida Petoskey, the father and mother of August Petoskey, were the owners of the land in question. Eudolph died in 1939, and Huida in 1942. For some years prior to their death August Petoskey, by verbal agreement, managed their property. In October, 1935, August Petoskey entered into a verbal agreement with plaintiff, by virtue of which plaintiff was to receive a commission of $1,500 if he found…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dodge v. BloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Mead v. RehmMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Krause v. BoraksMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Bergman v. DykhouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Benedek v. Mechanical Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Ekelman v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Pine-Wood Ltd. v. Detroit Mortgage & Realty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API