Legal Opinion

Colonial Discount Co. v. Rumens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 4, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment in an action to recover on a promissory note, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The plaintiff is a finance company claiming to be a holder before maturity for value. The note was given in connection with the sale of an automobile; and simultaneously therewith the defendant executed a chattel mortgage. Both of these instruments were executed in blank; and subsequently an employee of the automobile dealer filled in the chattel mortgage, describing therein an automobile which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ewing v. . WightmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Federal Credit Bureau, Inc. v. Zelkor Dining Car Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. National Bank of Watervliet v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. National Bank of Watervliet v. . MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Heiman v. MurphyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Petroleum Acceptance Corp. v. Queen Anne Laundry Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  2. United States v. Novsam Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Pennsylvania Exchange Bank v. Kenmore Furniture Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  4. Automobile Finance Co. v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API