Legal Opinion
National Bank of Watervliet v. . Martin
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 17, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that when the note fell due the maker did not tender plaintiff bank $250 and a renewal note for $7,250; no opinion.
Concur: Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Absent: His cock, Ch. J.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Carvel Corporation v. Diversified Management Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Federal Credit Bureau, Inc. v. Zelkor Dining Car Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Petroleum Acceptance Corp. v. Queen Anne Laundry Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Pellegrino v. First National Bank of NewarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Colonial Discount Co. v. RumensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.