Legal Opinion

Fogarazzo v. Lehman Bros.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 27, 2005No. 03 Civ. 5194(SAS)PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs, a class of investors who bought shares of RSL Communications, Inc. (“RSL”), allege that defendants, three investment banks, fraudulently manipulated the price of RSL stock by issuing materially misleading analyst reports. Plaintiffs now move for class certification and defendants oppose the motion, asserting that individual questions of law and fact predominate over common questions.

II. FACTS

On May 21, 2004, I issued an Opinion denying defendants’ motions to dismiss and summarizing plaintiffs’ claims.1 Familiarity with…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In re Vivendi Universal, S.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. Lapin v. Goldman Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  3. In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
  4. In re Credit Suisse-AOL Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  5. Carpenters Pension Trust Fund v. Barclays PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API