Fogarazzo v. Lehman Bros.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, a class of investors who bought shares of RSL Communications, Inc. (“RSL”), allege that defendants, three investment banks, fraudulently manipulated the price of RSL stock by issuing materially misleading analyst reports. Plaintiffs now move for class certification and defendants oppose the motion, asserting that individual questions of law and fact predominate over common questions.
II. FACTS
On May 21, 2004, I issued an Opinion denying defendants’ motions to dismiss and summarizing plaintiffs’ claims.1 Familiarity with…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- In re Vivendi Universal, S.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Lapin v. Goldman Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- In re Credit Suisse-AOL Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Carpenters Pension Trust Fund v. Barclays PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.