Panas v. Polonia Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re Panas)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
The instant proceeding causes us to address the rights of a mortgagee in possession of certain residential realty, and the ability of a debtor-mortgagor to regain possession of that realty by means of a turnover proceeding under 11 U.S.C. § 542(a). We conclude that the Mortgagee here, although otherwise obliged to comply with a Pennsylvania statute requiring notice prior to taking possession of the realty, was excused from same due to the abandonment of the property by the Debtor and his ex-wife-co-mortgagor. Hence, we conclude that the Mortgagee acted…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Appellant, v. the GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Turnway Corporation v. SofferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Knighton v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re JablonskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re KleinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Apex Mortgage Corporation v. Great Northern Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019