State v. Davis

BRITT, Judge.

By his first assignment of error, defendant contends that certain improper questions asked by the solicitor, and certain improper testimony illicited by him, resulted in prejudicial error to defendant. There are three exceptions included in this assignment and we will treat them separately.

With respect to Exception 5, the record discloses:

“Q. How many checks?

A. I guess 10 or 12, altogether.

Dependant: Objection.

Court: Sustained. Motion to strike allowed. Ladies and gentlemen, disregard the testimony of the witness about 10 or 12 checks. Don’t consider that.

Exception No. 5.”

It is…