Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Ten Eyck
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided May 7, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
From the testimony of the subscribing witnesses, the court finds that the propounded instrument dated April 26, 1932, was duly executed. (Dec. Est. Law, § 21.)
*444Decedent, a resident of Kings county, while en route to his home, was taken critically ill and died at Hendersonville, N. C. Immediately upon receipt of the news of his illness, petitioner, her husband and her sister hastened to Hendersonville, not arriving thereat, however, until after decedent’s death. Among decedent’s traveling effects was a black bag, wherein was found an envelope containing the instrument offered for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re the Probate of the Will of HopkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- In Re the Probate of the Alleged Last Will & Testament of StickneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- In Re Proving the Will of ParsonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- In re the Application for the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of ParsonsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1922
- In re StickneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Probate of the Will of BonnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- In re the Estate of FrazellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
- In re the Estate of MortensenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re the Probate of the Will of DavisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
- In re the Probate of the Will of RosenbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.