Legal Opinion
In Re Chatham Woods Holdings, LLC
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 16, 2008No. 2007-046PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.
¶ 1. Plaintiff Chatham Woods Holdings, LLC appeals from a decision affirming additional premium charges on a workers’ compensation insurance policy issued by Peerless Insurance Company. The Commissioner of the Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities and Health Care Administration (Commissioner) concluded that Peerless was correct in classifying certain subcontractors as employees of Chatham Woods for purposes of workers’ compensation and thus was justified in charging Chatham Woods additional premiums. Chatham Woods argues that it is not responsible for the additional premiums because:…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Packett v. Moretown Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- O'Boyle v. Parker-Young Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. SurdamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- King v. SnideSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Edson v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cyr v. McDERMOTT'S, INC.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Kimberly Haller v. Champlain CollegeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- Klinker v. FurdigaDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2014
- Arnold v. PalmerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Arnold v. PalmerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.