Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. Eges v. Corlett

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1940No. 27668PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

This action in mandamus was instituted in the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county and is based upon the charge that the respondent, a common pleas judge, refuses to correct or amend and al-1 low a certain bill of exceptions prepared and presented by counsel for the relator who was the plaintiff in a certain action, the trial of which resulted in favor of the defendant.

Issue was made by petition, answer and reply,- recital of which is deemed unnecessary. The Court of Appeals overruled the motion of the relator for the appointment of a master commissioner “for the purpose of taking…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ostrander v. Parker-Fallis Insulation Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Ohio Real Estate Commission v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. State Ex Rel. Turner Printing MacHinery, Inc. v. WestroppOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State ex rel. Counts v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State, Ex Rel. Mack v. O'ConnorOhio Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API