Legal Opinion
In Re Fain
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 21, 1983No. A019142Published
1Opinion of the Court
139 Cal.App.3d 295 (1983)
188 Cal. Rptr. 653
In re WILLIAM ARCHIE FAIN on Habeas Corpus.
Docket No. A019142.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.
January 21, 1983.
COUNSEL
George Deukmejian and John K. Van de Kamp, Attorneys General, Robert H. Philibosian, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Arnold O. Overoye, Assistant Attorney General, Roger E. Venturi and Anthony L. Dicce, Deputy Attorneys General, for Appellant.
Robert Y. Bell for Respondent.
OPINION
MILLER, J.
We consider whether public outcry can be used as a basis for rescission of a prison inmate's parole date.
Background…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Connecticut Board of Pardons v. DumschatSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Jago v. Van CurenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.