Legal Opinion

Paine & Williams Co. v. Trump Products Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided January 5, 1935No. 4912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WEST, District Judge.

Suit for infringement of United States patent 1,580,075 on a rubber-faced mat or covering for automobile running boards, granted on April 6, 1926, on the application of E. E. Paine, filed August 13, 1923. The principal defense is invalidity. When this application was filed, running boards were generally covered with linoleum fastened with cement or glue. In the specification Paine states his objects as the securing of an improved corrugated tread surface and improved means for securing the mat to the running board. In his evidence he specified six disadvantages inhering…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kurtz v. Belle Hat Lining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  2. Florsheim v. SchillingSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. George Frost Co. v. CohnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902
  4. Van Heusen Products, Inc. v. Earl & WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924
  5. Adams v. Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clark v. Ace Rubber Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API