People v. Vermeulen
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
We granted leave to appeal in this case, consolidated on appeal with People v Hamacher, 432 Mich 157; 438 NW2d 43 (1989), to consider the application of the spousal communication privilege set forth in the Revised Judicature Act, § 2162.1 We conclude that the Court of Appeals correctly held that the privilege bars the testimony of the defendant’s wife in this case and affirm.
i
Rja § 21G22 provides two distinct privileges. The *35first, the spousal privilege, is only applicable when the witness and the spouse are married at the time of trial.3
The second privilege, the communication privilege, bars…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- People v. ZabijakMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- People v. LoveMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. HamacherMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Muetze v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. HamacherMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Engberg v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Engberg v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.