David E. Kennedy, Inc. v. Schleindl
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
Plaintiff issued a writ of foreign attachment which was served upon the garnishee named therein. At the time it was served, the garnishee had nothing in its hands belonging to the defendant; subsequently, before the return day of the writ and before the filing of interrogatories, money belonging to defendant did come into the hands of the garnishee. The question to be decided is: Did the attachment bind this money? The court below determined that it did not and discharged a rule for judgment against the garnishee; plaintiff has appealed.
When account is taken of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Raymond v. LeishmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Mindlin v. Saxony Spinning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Lewis Bremer's Sons v. MohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Falk Co. v. American Railway Express Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Franklin Fire Insurance v. WestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Riverside Trust Co. v. TwitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Sniderman v. NeroneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Frazier v. BergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corp. v. Bellanca Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Stewart v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.