Legal Opinion

Sinclair Marketing, Inc. v. Siepert

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1985No. 14959PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Appellant Sinclair sued to recover on defendants’ personal guaranties given to secure payment on an open account to Little America Refining Company, which was allegedly assigned to Sinclair. The district court granted summary judgment to the individual defendants. We reverse and remand, holding that material issues of fact remain which preclude summary judgment.

Siepert’s Distributing, Inc., is a closely held corporation whose principals 1 are Larry and Fay Siepert, husband and wife. On July 1, 1978, Siepert’s Distributing began buying petroleum products from Little America…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. First Security Bank of Idaho National Ass'n v. NeibaurIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Essex International, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. Earl A. ClamageCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  3. Industrial Investment Corp. v. RoccaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Burkhardt v. Bank of America Et Al.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  5. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. HamiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ashcraft v. Lookadoo, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
  2. New Holland, Inc. v. TrunkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Flying J, Inc. v. BoothWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Self-Help Ventures Fund v. Custom Finish, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Bret and Marti Kunz v. Nield, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API