Legal Opinion

Flying J, Inc. v. Booth

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1989No. 88-265PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Justice.

This vendor-creditor suit by Flying J, Inc., appellant, pursued an assigned written guaranty executed by Elvin L. and Jacqueline Booth, appellees, in favor of assignor, Husky Oil Company (Husky). 1 Cross motions for summary judgment were filed. The district court granted the appel-lees’ motion finding the instrument to be a non-assignable “special guaranty” precluding present enforcement as a matter of law.

Appellant presents as issues:

1. Does the Appellant, as successor in interest to the original holder of the guaranty at issue, have the legal right to enforce the guaranty.

2…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Cordova v. GosarWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Evansville National Bank v. KaufmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Albany County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Niederer v. FerreiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Madison v. MarlattWyoming Supreme Court · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  2. 40 North Corp. v. MorrellWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  3. New Holland, Inc. v. TrunkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Raymond v. SteenWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. J BAR H, INC. v. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API