Brooks v. Southern National Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Judge.
Defendants originally complained that this matter was not properly before us for decision since none of plaintiffs claims have been finally determined, but withdrew their objection prior to oral argument in light of the decision of our Supreme Court in DKH Corp. v. Rankin-Patterson Oil Co., Inc., 348 N.C. 583, 500 S.E.2d 666 (1998).
Plaintiff does not contend he actually exhausted any available administrative remedies. He alleges in his complaint that the merger/conversion plan for Mutual Savings Bank- was approved by SID, and that N.C. Gen. Stat. § 150B-38 (1995), et seq.,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Presnell v. PellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Society for Sav. in Cleveland v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- DKH CORP. v. Rankin-Patterson Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Faulkenbury v. TEACHERS'AND STATE EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEMCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Guthrie v. ConroyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Hemric v. GroceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Practice v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., & Computer Scis. Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Abrons Fam. Prac. & Urgent CareCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016